|
Creating Our
Public Face
By Grace Elting Castle, CLI
The investigative report---an invaluable
marketing tool or the curse of death? Each investigator makes this fateful
decision, and unfortunately, it is too often a decision that is made in complete
oblivion to the potentially disastrous consequences.
Over the years, in more seminars and meetings
than I care to remember, I have listened to investigators expound upon the
importance of recorded statements, of "dressing the part," of the
perfect pretext, or, in more recent times, the absolute necessity of computers,
databases and every conceivable electronic tool. A few have written, or spoken,
about taking statements. Seldom have I heard, or read, of the importance of the investigative
report to the success of an investigator’s business.
In the beginning:
The neophyte investigator, preparing to
open a business, must consider the report as one of the most important marketing
tools for the fledgling company. After the initial marketing has taken place,
the letterhead and business cards are printed, the phones are in, the computer
is installed and programmed and the first case comes in, the report becomes
king. The marketing effort which brought in this first case may have been the
most brilliant presentation known to man; the investigation conducted may rank
right up there with work done by the nation’s most renowned gumshoes, but if
the report is not professional, accurate, properly presented, and timely, there
may never be another assignment from that hard won client!
If you are just setting up your business,
please take the time to decide how your reports will be presented--the format,
the style--right down to the type size and font. Don’t leave anything to
chance. Your report should be as instantly recognizable to a client as your
business card and letterhead. The format alone should tell them that it is your
report. The presentation and content of the very first report received from you
should tell the client the following about you and your business:
-
You are a professional who cares about your
work product;
-
You know what’s important and how to present
it in a concise, usable manner;
-
You understand the case and what the client
needs to know;
-
You are interested in keeping this client;
-
You understand that what the client needs is a
report on the investigation, rather than on how important you think you are.
The format may have to be adjusted over the
first few months as you begin to learn more about the client’s needs and your
own abilities, but presenting a strong, professional report from the very
beginning will be the best marketing tool your company can ever possess. Always
be open to suggestions and critiques from your clients, keeping in mind that
their comments may be coming from having only known investigative reports from
prior investigators who thought they had to expound endlessly upon every detail,
always being careful to insert their every sneeze into the report. You may have
to re-educate your client to the value of having the details presented in a new
way, sans personal glorification.
"I’m already established, so what does
it matter?":
For the established investigator who
has not given serious thought to the presentation of the investigative report,
or who has always been "too busy to make it fancy," ---I can’t
express this strongly enough: Take the time to review your reports. Check
to see if they live up to the five previously listed criteria. What do your
reports say about your professionalism and expertise?
Then, ask yourself these questions:
-
Does this report show me to be concerned about
my client?
-
Does this report contain misspelled words,
incorrect grammar or incomplete sentences which make no sense, or have I
provided concise, clean, copy with valuable information?
-
Do I have difficulty finding the report on the
"busy" letterhead that shouts to the world how important I think
I am, or is my report obviously the most important information on
the page?
Negative answers to the second and third
questions are easily remedied. With modern computer programs, there is never an
excuse for a misspelled word. Windows 95 and other programs now also have a
grammar check. (Be careful, they can give you some very strange choices!) Unless
you are on your deathbed, an investigative report should never leave your office
without either your review and approval, or that of a trusted colleague
who is familiar with all aspects of the situation being reported. If there is
time, read the report aloud--there’s no better way to catch errors,
misstatements and the occasional nonsensical sentence that has resulted from
misunderstood dictation. The "busy" letterhead problem is easily
solved--either you re-design your current letterhead, or if you love it
passionately, design a simple letterhead specifically for your reports. Your
cover letter can be done on your beloved, "look at me" original
letterhead.
Keeping it simple:
There is, to put it bluntly, no reason
to ramble on and on in an investigative report! What the client needs are facts,
just the facts, not a novel. Reports are not novels. They are not essays. They
are not our opportunity to expound and to show off. They are our opportunity to
give a client the facts in the most concise, usable form possible.
We are, of course, hired for our expertise and
often it is vital that the client have our personal "take" on a
situation or witness. We haven’t completely satisfied our role as
investigators if we neglect to mention to the attorney-client that the witness
will not be likely to impress the jury. Likewise, we have failed in our mission
if we don’t report that our client’s client has a seamy background which
involves people who may be called as witnesses by the prosecution or the defense
in the civil case. But we must be wise enough to know how, when and where to
report that information. Just throwing it into the middle of a lengthy, rambling
report nearly assures that our client will be too bored to read that far into
our masterpiece. Generally, this information is presented in a report that is
separate from the facts of the investigation.
Too often I have read reports from
investigators in a format similar to the following (any resemblance to anything
a reader might have written is purely coincidental!):
This investigator drove to 1234 S. Lincoln St.
in Northbrook, WI on Saturday, Septber 23, 1996 and knoked on the door but no
one ansered so I talked to a lady who told me that s person was not home and
probly wouldn’t be home until next Wenesday, so I got into my car and drove
home and called to see if the lady was home at the house where I had just been a
little wile ago and no one ansered. Then I went back to the house at 1234 S.
Lincoln St. at Northbrook, WI on Tusday and the lady said that no one was home
and so I went back to my office and did some reports and tried to call the house
but no one ansered. I know that you wanted to this person in the house at 1234
S. Lincoln St. in Northbrook, WI intervued, but no one was home when I knoked on
the door and called on the phone so I need to know what you want me. My bill is
$550.I look forward to what you want me to go back to 1234 S. Lincoln St. in
Northbrook, WI to see if any body is home.
Well, first I would really have preferred to
have had PARAGRAPHS in this report, with proper sentences and correctly spelled
words, as well as having the billing statement be a completely separate
document, presented professionally. (No, I do not pay $550 for two knocks upon a
door, so please don’t call for such an assignment!)
But of even more importance, the writer of this
report is shouting to the client that there is no professional expertise in this
company, there is no understanding of what is needed, and probably a
misunderstanding of the importance of the assignment, as well as evidence that
this investigator does not listen to what is said.
In many instances, it is just as easy to pick
up the phone and call the client for further instructions. If, for some reason,
it is very important to document every activity, do it concisely, and without
flourish.
Never, ever, include billing information in an
activity report! It may be necessary to provide a brief status report to a
client in which the activities to date are detailed, and a "bill to
date" estimate is provided, but that is an entirely separate report from
what was being attempted in my prior example.
If my original assignment to this fictitious
investigator had been to interview the resident, my immediate reaction to this
report would be one of extreme thankfulness that the person was not home! I must
have been impressed with the investigator’s marketing pitch, or had received a
recommendation from a valued colleague (who is now on my "list"), but based
on this report, I would find another investigator to complete this task.
Just as I can tell more about a job applicant’s
personality, expertise and professionalism from the cover letter than
from the resume, the investigator’s report tells me more than I’ll ever
learn from a brochure or personal sales pitch. Over the years I have retained
investigators from throughout the United States and even when they were highly
recommended I held my breath until that first report, whether written or oral,
came into my office. Timeliness is important, of course, but the report tells us
whether this investigator understands the assignment, takes pride in doing a
good job, and knows how to put the information together in a usable format.
So too, our own clients may feel frustrated
when trying to read our reports. If they have to wade through run-on sentences,
full block reports with no paragraphs, misspelled and misused words and
confusing information, we will be quickly replaced by a well organized,
conscientious investigator who has taken the time to be professional.
One well-written report, packed with useful,
pertinent information can do more marketing, promote more goodwill, and more
quickly establish a reputation of professionalism for our company than will the
many thousands of dollars poured into fancy informational packets and brochures.
This one report may be handled by an
attorney-client, the secretary or legal assistant, the case paralegal, the
prosecutor and the prosecutor’s assistants and investigators (or the civil
defense team) and potentially, even the judge, jury, maybe some police officers,
FBI or other agency personnel, and in this period of history, quite possibly by
the media. Each will make a judgment about our expertise and professionalism
based on this one report. Each is a potential client or referral agent for our
company! Or, each can cause snickering behind our back. Since we have no way to
judge which report will travel that path, it behooves us to prepare every report
as if it were to be handed to a potential client as a sample of our company’s
expertise. When reviewing your reports, imagine them blown up to 30 x 40 inches
for a trial exhibit---is this the public "face" that you wish to put
forth for your company, or does it need some fine tuning?
The following is a brief example of a usable
format which has been successfully used in both civil cases for the plaintiff,
and criminal defense cases. Based on a system of reporting first explained to me
by NALI’s Past Region VII Director Harold Nash, this simplified reporting
format can be modified not only to fit every case and situation, but can be
individualized for use by every investigation firm. Work with it; personalize it
to suit your needs and those of your clients, -- remember that it’s speaking
for your professionalism and that you want your clients to be positively
influenced by the report.
Confidential Report
| To |
: |
Ms. Civil Attorney |
| From |
: |
Sam Spade |
| Date |
: |
11/21/00 (This is optional,
depending on type of report. I.E. you may only want to list the date of the
interview) |
| RE |
: |
Nancy Hucster vs.
City of Rangool
Madison County Circuit Court Case 97-4296
Your File Number: 97-113-00594 |
|
|
Interview of: Janice Halliday
Monday, October 22, 1997
|
Janice Halliday
| *Date of birth |
: |
6/14/79 |
| SSN |
: |
457-33-8905 |
| Driver’s License |
: |
H6708069584 (North Carolina) |
| Address |
: |
3246 NE China Road
Charleston, North Carolina 777950 |
| Phone |
: |
811-987-9992 |
| Employer |
: |
Mt. Carmin Photo Shop
4447 NW Jackson
Charleston, North Carolina 777950 |
| Phone |
: |
811-467-2224 |
| Criminal record |
: |
None reported by Halliday
(No records search done) |
Janice Halliday is the niece of the plaintiff.
She was interviewed by telephone on Monday, October 22, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. by Sam
Spade of this firm.
The following is an in substance report
of the information offered by Halliday:
-
Halliday is the daughter of Plaintiff Nancy
Hucster’s sister, Marcia Bohms and the late Charles Halliday, who died in an
automobile collision in April 1996.
-
Halliday is not interested in testifying as a
character witness for her aunt, Plaintiff Hucster. Halliday describes their
relationship as "cool," and "not friendly."
-
Halliday stated that the Plaintiff mistreats
Mrs. Clarice Brown, who is the Plaintiff’s 72 year old mother and Halliday’s
grandmother, by constantly borrowing money from her. Halliday also stated that
the Plaintiff recently wrecked Mrs. Brown’s only car and has not replaced it
or offered to help her to get other transportation.
-
Halliday stated that she has not discussed
this lawsuit with the Plaintiff.
-
Halliday does not intend to be at the trial,
nor to support the Plaintiff in any manner.
-End of report-
*Please note
that not all investigators recommend listing all the personal data that I have
included in the header of this report. In one of the truly outstanding
investigation training sessions I’ve had the pleasure to attend, NALI Past
Region VII Director John Brumfield, CLI, outlined his reasons for NOT including
any more than the person’s name. In short, Brumfield cautioned against doing
all the work for the other side, urging investigators to provide personal
information in a separate work product report to the attorney-client. His
reasoning was logical and I tried to do it that way for awhile, but
unfortunately my clients preferred to have all the information in one place.
With a similar format, you can expand,
delete, and modify to your heart’s content, but you have effectively cut out
the verbosity that makes so many investigative reports cumbersome. If there is a
reason to say that the phone rang twenty-two times before anyone answered it,
then do so, but otherwise it is sufficient to say that Ms. Halliday was
interviewed by phone on a certain day and at a certain time. If she were a
willing character witness, there would be reason to go into more detail about
background, relationships and other information that might lead to her being
discredited by the defense. Or, if there seems a possibility that her hostility
might lead to her being interviewed by the defense, your interview and
subsequent report might be more detailed and lengthy. The preceding sample was
just that---a sample to help investigators to begin thinking about ways
to simplify their reports.
You may have noticed that I used the word
"Halliday" numerous times. I deliberately avoid the use of pronouns as
much as possible. Investigative reports don’t have to be written like novels.
They don’t have to "flow" and be comfortable to read. They must
convey facts in the most concise, simple manner possible---without providing a
potential misinterpretation which the use of personal pronouns is wont to do.
For example, if we were to re-write the
sentence of the previous report example, using personal pronouns, we might end
up a confusing mess like this:
She stated that she mistreats Mrs. Clarice
Brown, who is her 72 year old mother and her grandmother, by constantly
borrowing money from her. She also stated that she recently wrecked her only car
and has not replaced it or offered to help her to get other transportation.
This is an extreme example, but it is
surprising how many reports are written with no regard to the fact that the
reader won’t know what the investigator knows, unless it is spelled out
succinctly. Pronouns do not promote clarity. Read your reports carefully to see
if it is absolutely clear to the reader (your client and all those other
potential readers) what happened, to whom, and who did what!
And remember, as you are doing your
investigations, keep in mind that you have to gather enough information to
guarantee that your most effective marketing tool, your "public face"
will be a shining example of your company’s expertise and professionalism.
© 1997
Grace Elting Castle
(First published in The Legal Investigator
magazine, November 1997)
|